Key result
High CIOSS links to ~333% higher mortality risk versus low scores in surgical patients.
Why the study?
Oxidative stress plays an important role in colorectal cancer development, but a prognostic scoring system based on oxidative stress indexes was lacking.
Does the CRC-Integrated Oxidative Stress Score (CIOSS) predict overall and disease-free survival in colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgery?
Cohort (n=1,422)
Randomly assigned to training or validation set
Does the CRC-Integrated Oxidative Stress Score (CIOSS) predict overall and disease-free survival in colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgery?
The CRC-Integrated Oxidative Stress Score (CIOSS) is a powerful prognostic indicator for overall and disease-free survival in colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgery.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid CRC prognostic stratification in observational data; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Oxidative stress plays an important role in the development of colorectal cancer (CRC). This study is aimed at developing and validating a novel scoring system, based on oxidative stress indexes, for prognostic prediction in CRC patients. A retrospective analysis of 1422 CRC patients who underwent surgical resection between January 2013 and December 2017 was performed. These patients were randomly assigned to the training set (n = 1022) or the validation set (n = 400). Cox regression model was used to analyze the laboratory parameters. The CRC‐Integrated Oxidative Stress Score (CIOSS) was developed from albumin (ALB), direct bilirubin (DBIL), and blood urea nitrogen (BUN), which were significantly associated with survival in CRC patients. Furthermore, a survival nomogram was generated by combining the CIOSS with other beneficial clinical characteristics. The CIOSS generated was as follows: 0.074 × albumin (g/L), −0.094 × bilirubin (μmol/L), and ‐0.099 × blood urea nitrogen (mmol/L), based on the multivariable Cox regression analysis. Using 50% (0.1025) and 85% (0.481) of CIOSS as cutoff values, three prognostically distinct groups were formed. Patients with high CIOSS experienced worse overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR] = 4.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.80‐6.68; P < 0.001) and worse disease‐free survival (DFS) (HR = 3.02; 95% CI, 1.96‐4.64; P < 0.001) compared to those with low CIOSS. This predictive nomogram had good calibration and discrimination. ROC analyses showed that the CIOSS possessed excellent performance (AUC = 0.818) in predicting DFS. The AUC of the OS nomogram based on CIOSS, TNM stage, T stage, and chemotherapy was 0.812, while that of the DFS nomogram based on CIOSS, T stage, and TNM stage was 0.855. Decision curve analysis showed that these two prediction models were clinically useful. CIOSS is a CRC‐specific prognostic index based on the combination of available oxidative stress indexes. High CIOSS is a powerful indicator of poor prognosis. The CIOSS also showed better predictive performance compared to TNM stage in CRC patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cao et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Colorectal cancer (n=1,422). High CRC-Integrated Oxidative Stress Score (CIOSS) vs. Low CIOSS was evaluated on Overall survival (OS) (HR 4.33, 95% CI 2.80-6.68, p=<0.001). High CRC-Integrated Oxidative Stress Score (CIOSS) was associated with significantly worse overall survival (HR 4.33; 95% CI 2.80-6.68; P<0.001) compared to low CIOSS in patients undergoing surgery.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: