Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Tetraalkylhydrido‐and Tetraalkylmethyldialuminate(5) with Aluminium – Aluminium Bond: [R2Al – AlXR2]– {RCH(SiMe3)2; XH, Me} Tetrakis[bis(trimethylsilyl)methyl]dialuminium(4) (1) with an aluminium – aluminium bond reacts with tert1‐butyllithium in the presence of the chelating tetramethylethylenediamine (TMEDA) to give a hydridodialuminate(5) 2 [R2Al – AlHR2]− {RCH(SiMe3)2} by β1‐elimination and addition of the hydride anion to one aluminium atom. By treatment of 1 with methyllithium a similar product is formed containing a methyl group bound to aluminium: [R2A1 – AlMeR2]– 3. As shown by crystal structure determination the aluminium – aluminium bond of both molecules is not bridged. Instead, the compounds contain a saturated, four‐coordinated aluminium neighbouring an unsaturated, threefold coordinated aluminium atom. While in the hydrogen compound 2 the aluminium – aluminium bond length [266.7(3) pm] remains unaffected in comparison to the neutral starting compound 1, it is lengthened in the methyl derivative 3 by 9 pm to 275.2(3) pm probably due to the higher sterical demand of the methyl group.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Uhl et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: