To examine the clinical role of BAYm 1099, 15 diet-treated non-insulin-dependent diabetic (NIDDM) subjects were randomized to start drug (50 mg 3 times/day) or placebo after a 4-wk run-in period in a double-blind crossover study. Treatment periods (4 wk) were separated by a 2-wk washout period. During the last week of each treatment period, three test meals (TMs) were administered: 60 g starch (TM1), 25 g sucrose (TM2), and combined 60 g starch and 25 g sucrose (TM3). Twelve subjects completed the study. The peak postprandial blood glucose, lactate, and pyruvate levels (means +/- SE) were significantly lower with active drug after all test meals, particularly TM2 (11.3 +/- 1.0 vs. 14.3 +/- 1.4 mM, P less than .001; 1.53 +/- 0.20 vs. 2.48 +/- 0.17 mM, P less than .001; and 105.1 +/- 17.6 vs. 147.6 +/- 11.1 microM, P less than) less than .001; and 105.1 +/- 17.6 vs. 147.6 +/- 11.1 microM, P less than .05, respectively. Peak blood glucose levels were significantly delayed. However, fasting blood glucose, HbA1, fructosamine, and cholesterol did not change during active treatment (10.0 +/- 1.0 vs. 9.9 +/- 1.0 mM, 10.0 +/- 0.7 vs. 9.4 +/- 0.7%, 2.44 +/- 0.10 vs. 2.37 +/- 0.07 mmol/100 g protein, and 6.7 +/- 0.3 vs. 6.5 +/- 0.3 mM, P NS). Flatulence and diarrhea were severe in 2 subjects, requiring termination of study. Thus, in NIDDM, BAYm 1099 was effective in diminishing and delaying postprandial excursions of blood glucose, lactate, and pyruvate after high- and low-sucrose meals, but overall metabolic control remained unchanged.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Samad et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: