Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
INTRODUCTION: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease with variable clinical manifestations and disease activity. Emerging evidence suggests that vitamin D may play a role in immune regulation and disease pathogenesis. This study aimed to investigate the association between serum vitamin D levels and disease activity in patients with SLE at Mandalay General Hospital. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 60 patients diagnosed with SLE. Disease activity was assessed using the Systemic Lupus Activity Measure (SLAM) score. Serum vitamin D levels were measured using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) at the National Health Laboratory, Mandalay. Patients were categorized into active and inactive disease groups based on SLAM scores, and intergroup comparisons were made. RESULTS: Among the 60 patients, the majority (43.3%) were aged 21-30 years, with a mean ± SD age of 25.77 ± 7.98 years. Female patients predominated (98.3%; female-to-male ratio 59:1). The mean SLAM score was 9.25 ± 2.94. Common clinical features included anaemia (56.7%), skin rash (33.3%), mucosal ulcers (16.7%), arthritis (16.7%), serositis (11.7%), vasculitis (11.7%), and neuropsychiatric lupus (5%). Patients with active disease had significantly lower serum vitamin D levels (12.2 ± 1.36 ng/mL) compared to those with inactive disease (26.1 ± 10.22 ng/mL; t = 5.55, p < 0.0001). A moderate inverse correlation was observed between SLAM scores and vitamin D levels (Pearson's r = -0.51, p < 0.0001), suggesting a clinically meaningful association between lower vitamin D levels and higher disease activity. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates a moderate inverse relationship between serum vitamin D levels and SLE disease activity. These findings suggest that vitamin D may serve as a potential biomarker for disease monitoring. However, due to the cross-sectional design and relatively small sample size, causality cannot be established. Further longitudinal studies are recommended.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: