Key result
Decreasing estimated glomerular filtration rate was associated with a higher likelihood of FFR-/iFR/RFR+ discordance (OR 0.98 per 1 mL/min/1.73 m2, p=0.0455) during physiological assessment of coronary circulation.
Why the study?
Diagnosing myocardial ischemia in CKD patients is crucial due to high CAD mortality, but the impact of kidney function on coronary physiological assessment is unclear.
Does kidney function impact the results of coronary circulation physiological assessment (FFR, iFR, RFR) in patients undergoing coronary evaluation?
Observational (n=279)
No
Does kidney function impact the results of coronary circulation physiological assessment (FFR, iFR, RFR) in patients undergoing coronary evaluation?
Kidney function influences coronary physiological assessments, with preserved eGFR (≥70 mL/min/1.73 m2) associated with more frequent FFR+/non-hyperemic index- discrepancies, especially in non-LAD vessels.
eGFR warrants consideration when interpreting FFR/non-hyperemic index discordance; leaves open whether kidney-specific thresholds improve decision-making.
Background: Diagnosing myocardial ischemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients is crucial since coronary artery disease (CAD) forms the predominant cause of mortality in these patients. Thus, this study aimed to assess the impact of kidney function on the results of coronary circulation physiological assessment. Methods: Data were collected from 279 consecutive patients admitted to the Clinical Department of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions at the University Hospital in Krakow. A total of 417 vessels were assessed for fractional flow reserve (FFR) and non-hyperemic resting pressure ratios, such as instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) and resting full-cycle ratio (RFR). Patients were categorized into two groups: glomerular filtration rate (GFR)-L (estimated GFR (eGFR) <70 mL/min/1.73 m2) and GFR-H (eGFR ≥70 mL/min/1.73 m2). Results: A total of 118 patients (42.3%) were included in the GFR-L group, while 161 patients (57.7%) were in the GFR-H group. The left anterior descending branch of the left coronary artery (LAD) was the assessed vessel in approximately 60% of procedures, the frequency of which was very similar in both study groups. Focusing solely on LAD assessments, both FFR metrics (continuous and binary) were comparable between the groups. In contrast, for non-LAD vessels, the GFR-H group revealed substantially reduced FFR values, with more vessels displaying significant constriction. Patients in the GFR-H group showed higher instances of FFR+ iFR/RFR- discrepancies than their lower eGFR counterparts. An eGFR of 70 mL/min/1.73 m2 was the optimal cut-off to differentiate patients concerning the mentioned discrepancies. Conclusions: Kidney function influenced the coronary circulation physiological assessment results. Patients with reduced eGFR tended to have negative hyperemic assessments, especially in non-LAD vessels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zasada et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Stable coronary artery disease with borderline atherosclerotic lesions (n=279). Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) vs. Higher eGFR was evaluated on FFR- | iFR/RFR+ discrepancy (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.99, p=0.0455). Decreasing estimated glomerular filtration rate was associated with a higher likelihood of FFR-/iFR/RFR+ discordance (OR 0.98 per 1 mL/min/1.73 m2, p=0.0455) during physiological assessment of coronary circulation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: