We present results of detailed ac susceptibility, magnetization and specific heat measurements in Heusler alloys Ni 50 Mn 34 In 16 and Ni 50 Mn 34 Sn 16 . These alloys undergo a paramagnetic to ferromagnetic transition around 305 K, which is followed by a martensitic transition in the temperature regime around 220 K. Inside the martensite phase both the alloys show signatures of field-induced transition from martensite to austenite phase. Both field- and temperature-induced martensite–austenite transitions are relatively sharp in Ni 50 Mn 34 In 16 . We estimate the isothermal magnetic entropy change and adiabatic temperature change across the various phase transitions in these alloys and investigate the possible influence of these transitions on the estimated magnetocaloric effect. The sharp martensitic transition in Ni 50 Mn 34 In 16 gives rise to a comparatively large inverse magnetocaloric effect across this transition. On the other hand the magnitudes of the conventional magnetocaloric effect associated with the paramagnetic to ferromagnetic transition are quite comparable in these alloys.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sharma et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: