Various short-run crises-exchange rate crises, debt crises, inflation crises, balance-of-payment crises, financial crises-have dominated recent macroeconomic research about Latin America.This literature focuses on the causes of these crises and their short-run impact on macroeconomic fluctuations, taking the trend paths of macroeconomic variables as exogenous.Systematic analyses of Latin American macroeconomic trends have received much less attention.1 This article presents a comparative analysis of Latin American macroeconomic trends over the last 50 years using a neoclassical growth framework.We first compare long-run Latin American macroeconomic performance to that in a number of other countries to provide a benchmark for what Latin America could have reasonably achieved.We make two sets of comparisons.We compare Latin America's long-run performance to that in a peer group of other Western market economies-the other countries with a large fraction of citizens of Western European descent.This comparison shows that all Western countries-including those with initial income levels reasonably similar to those in Latin America in 1950-have made substantial progress in catching up to the United States.In sharp contrast, no Latin American country has made any significant progress in catching up to the United States.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cole et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: