This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
OBJECTIVE: Neuronavigation is an extremely common and useful system in intracranial surgeries. It is used to determine the pre-operative incision, perform the most appropriate craniotomy, and provide intraoperative guidance. However, its use in meningioma surgery is controversial, and there is a dilemma whether it is necessary. This study was performed to determine the effect of neuronavigation in meningioma surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Information related to pre-operative clinical evaluation and use of neuronavigation, neuroimaging, intraoperative tumor and surgical related information, and post-operative outcomes of 75 consecutive patients with meningiomas between January 2015 and 2020 were retrospectively collected. The values between groups were statistically compared. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in pre-operative patient and tumor characteristics between the groups. In cases using neuronavigation, the mean operative time, craniotomy size, and blood loss during tumor resection were significantly lower, and post-operative hospital stay was shorter in these patients (p < 0.05). However, there were no differences in post-operative complications and clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: The use of neuronavigation in meningioma surgery reduces blood loss during surgery, reduces the surgical time, and shortens the post-operative hospital stay. Thus, we conclude that the neuronavigation system is useful in meningioma surgery.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akyüz et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: