⌘+K

Pulse Explore Communities Researchers Journals

Home Communities Explore

June 1, 1996Oikos

Solitude versus Gregariousness: Do Physical Benefits Drive the Choice in Overwintering Meadow Voles?

Dominique Berteaux Jean‐Marie Bergeron Donald W. Thomas H. Lapierre H. Lapierre

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Abstract

Dominique Berteaux, Jean-Marie Bergeron, Donald W. Thomas, , Solitude versus Gregariousness: Do Physical Benefits Drive the Choice in Overwintering Meadow Voles?, Oikos, Vol. 76, No. 2 (Jun., 1996), pp. 330-336

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Berteaux et al. (1996) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aadf4c3a081e442804f6b9c https://doi.org/10.2307/3546205

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context:

1Reach‐scale benthic substrate composition shapes hyporheic invertebrate communities and physicochemical characteristics under baseflow conditionsOikos · Thu,
2Vegetation structure and morphology shape the functional diversity of understory bird communities during tropical forest succession, northwest EcuadorOikos · Fri,
3Avian frugivore species richness influences dietary niche breadth and network properties in Asian wet tropical forestsOikos · Mon,
4Complex effects of ectoparasites on avian fitness: a meta‐analysisOikos · Mon,
5Warming effects on population sizes and top–down control are dependent on temperature rangeOikos · Mon,

More from Oikos

Warming and predation drive rapid evolution of ecosystem functioning but not functional traitsMon,
Field translocation across latitudes reveals local conditions drive microbiome reassembly in a damselflyMon,
Intraguild interactions shape vocal output and diel activity patterns in sympatric forest owlsMon,
Ephemeral resources promote adaptive sociality in wild guppiesMon,
Competition and soil conditions limit the growth of High Arctic non‐native plantsSat,