In jawed vertebrates, betagamma-crystallins are restricted to the eye lens and thus excellent markers of lens evolution. These betagamma-crystallins are four Greek key motifs/two domain proteins, whereas the urochordate betagamma-crystallin has a single domain. To trace the origin of the vertebrate betagamma-crystallin genes, we searched for homologues in the genomes of a jawless vertebrate (lamprey) and of a cephalochordate (lancelet). The lamprey genome contains orthologs of the gnathostome betaB1-, betaA2- and gammaN-crystallin genes and a single domain gammaN-crystallin-like gene. It contains at least two gamma-crystallin genes, but lacks the gnathostome gammaS-crystallin gene. The genome also encodes a non-lenticular protein containing betagamma-crystallin motifs, AIM1, also found in gnathostomes but not detectable in the uro- or cephalochordate genome. The four cephalochordate betagamma-crystallin genes found encode two-domain proteins. Unlike the vertebrate betagamma-crystallins but like the urochordate betagamma-crystallin, three of the predicted proteins contain calcium-binding sites. In the cephalochordate betagamma-crystallin genes, the introns are located within motif-encoding region, while in the urochordate and in the vertebrate betagamma-crystallin genes the introns are between motif- and/or domain encoding regions. Coincident with the evolution of the vertebrate lens an ancestral urochordate type betagamma-crystallin gene rapidly expanded and diverged in the ancestral vertebrate before the cyclostomes/gnathostomes split. The beta- and gammaN-crystallin genes were maintained in subsequent evolution, and, given the selection pressure imposed by accurate vision, must be essential for lens function. The gamma-crystallin genes show lineage specific expansion and contraction, presumably in adaptation to the demands on vision resulting from (changes in) lifestyle.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kappé et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: