This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The present study assessed the effects of low protein and alternative protein diets with compound enzyme preparations supplementation on the growth performance and intestinal health of Langshan chickens. A total of 288 Langshan roosters at the age of 30 d were selected, and six diets were prepared according to 3 × 2 factor test: the corn-soybean meal, corn-soybean meal with enzymes, low protein meal, low protein meal with enzymes, corn-soybean-miscellaneous meal, and corn-soybean-miscellaneous meal with enzymes. The experiment lasted for 56 d. Over the entire experiment, the corn-soybean-miscellaneous diet significantly increased average daily gain and significantly reduced the feed-to-gain ratio (p < 0.05). The corn-soybean miscellaneous meal diet significantly decreased the apparent digestibility of protein (p < 0.05), while enzyme supplementation significantly increased the digestibility of crude protein and crude ash (p < 0.05). Intestinal morphology showed that low protein and corn-soybean-miscellaneous meal diets increased the villus height of birds at 58 d of age (p < 0.05). Enzyme-supplemented diets significantly increased amylase activity in the jejunal digesta of broilers at 58 d of age (p < 0.05). Corn-soybean-miscellaneous diet significantly decreased protease activity compared with those fed with corn-soybean meal (p < 0.05). There were significant interactions on mRNA expressions in intestinal tight barriers and amino acid transporters by diet type and enzyme supplementation. A low protein diet and corn-soybean miscellaneous meal diet could destroy the intestinal barrier and reduce amino acid transporter gene expression levels, which could be improved after adding enzyme preparations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: