Stochastic simulation was used to assess the suitability of alternative dependent variables in international sire evaluation. Three such variables were considered: daughter yield deviations (DYD), national proofs (ETA), and de-regressed national proofs (DPRF). Data from two dairy cattle populations considering 10 generations were simulated. Genetic ties necessary for a joint evaluation of the two populations were established with bull exchange in each generation. De-regressed national proofs were the best and ETA were the worst in estimating genetic difference between the two populations and ranking bulls across country. Further, de-regressed national proofs can be easily computed and, contrary to DYD, are always available. De-regressed national proofs are recommended as dependent variables in across country sire evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sigurdsson et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: