Key result
Edoxaban seeks non-inferiority to warfarin for preventing thrombotic progression in a phase 3 CTEPH protocol.
Why the study?
Lifelong warfarin anticoagulation in CTEPH patients has safety and convenience limitations, and the efficacy and safety of edoxaban compared to warfarin in CTEPH remain to be established.
Does edoxaban prevent worsening of CTEPH non-inferiorly to warfarin in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension?
RCT (n=74)
Single-blind
1:1
Yes
Does edoxaban prevent worsening of CTEPH non-inferiorly to warfarin in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension?
The KABUKI trial is a phase 3 study protocol designed to evaluate whether edoxaban is non-inferior to warfarin for efficacy and safety in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.
INTRODUCTION: Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a complication of prior pulmonary thromboembolism (PE), caused by incomplete clot dissolution after PE. In patients with CTEPH, lifelong anticoagulation is mandatory to prevent recurrence of PE and secondary in situ thrombus formation. Warfarin, a vitamin K antagonist, is commonly used for anticoagulation in CTEPH based on historical experience and evidence. The anticoagulant activity of warfarin is affected by food and drug interactions, requiring regular monitoring of prothrombin time. The lability of anticoagulant effect often results in haemorrhagic and thromboembolic complications. Thus, lifelong warfarin is a handicap in terms of safety and convenience. Currently, the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in CTEPH has increased with the advent of four DOACs. The safety of DOACs is superior to warfarin, with less intracranial bleeding in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. Edoxaban, the latest DOAC, also has proven efficacy and safety for those diseases in two large clinical trials; the ENGAGE-AF trial and HOKUSAI-VTE trial. The present trial seeks to evaluate whether edoxaban is non-inferior to warfarin in preventing worsening of CTEPH. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The KABUKI trial (is an investigator-initiated, multicentre, phase 3, randomised, single-blind, parallel-group, warfarin-controlled, non-inferiority trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of edoxaban versus warfarin (vitamin K Antagonist) in subjects with chronic thromBoembolic pUlmonary hypertension taking warfarin (vitamin K antagonIst) at baseline) is designed to prove the non-inferiority of edoxaban to warfarin in terms of efficacy and safety in patients with CTEPH. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study is approved by the Institutional Review Board of each participating institution. The findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal, including positive, negative and inconclusive results. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04730037. PROTOCOL VERSION: This paper was written per the study protocol V.4.0, dated 29 January 2021.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hosokawa et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) (n=74). Edoxaban vs. Warfarin was evaluated on Change in catheter-based pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) at 1 year compared with baseline (1 year/baseline PVR ratio). Edoxaban will be evaluated for non-inferiority compared to warfarin in preventing thrombotic progression in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension in this phase 3 trial protocol.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: