Key result
WRB serves as the ER membrane receptor for TRC40 to mediate tail-anchored protein insertion.
Why the study?
The ER membrane receptor mediating TRC40/Asna1-dependent insertion of tail-anchored proteins in mammalian cells was unidentified.
The identification of WRB (CHD5) as the ER receptor for TRC40/Asna1 provides a new mechanistic understanding of tail-anchored protein insertion, with potential implications for its role in congenital heart disease.
May link WRB to congenital heart disease mechanisms; leaves open any therapeutic relevance in patients.
Tail-anchored (TA) proteins are post-translationally targeted to and inserted into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane through their single C-terminal transmembrane domain. Membrane insertion of TA proteins in mammalian cells is mediated by the ATPase TRC40/Asna1 (Get3 in yeast) and a receptor in the ER membrane. We have identified tryptophan-rich basic protein (WRB), also known as congenital heart disease protein 5 (CHD5), as the ER membrane receptor for TRC40/Asna1. WRB shows sequence similarity to Get1, a subunit of the membrane receptor complex for yeast Get3. Using biochemical and cell imaging approaches, we demonstrate that WRB is an ER-resident membrane protein that interacts with TRC40/Asna1 and recruits it to the ER membrane. We identify the coiled-coil domain of WRB as the binding site for TRC40/Asna1 and show that a soluble form of the coiled-coil domain interferes with TRC40/Asna1-mediated membrane insertion of TA proteins. The identification of WRB as a component of the TRC (Get) pathway for membrane insertion of TA proteins raises new questions concerning the proposed roles of WRB (CHD5) in congenital heart disease, and heart and eye development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vilardi et al. (2011) studied this question. Tryptophan-rich basic protein (WRB) was identified as the endoplasmic reticulum membrane receptor for TRC40/Asna1, mediating the insertion of tail-anchored proteins.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: