The bioavailability of two fixed dose combination of dutasteride 0.5 mg and tamsulosin hydrochloride 0.4 mg was compared in two single-dose, randomized, open-label, 2-way, crossover bioequivalence studies with 52 Brazilian healthy male subjects. One study was under fasting conditions and the other one after a standard breakfast. Blood samples were taken predose and up to 96 h postdose and obtained plasma was frozen and kept until analysis. Plasmatic concentrations of dutasteride and tamsulosin were determined simultaneously using a validated UPLC-MS/MS method. Chromatographic separation was achieved with the chromatographic column UPLC BEH C18 and total run time was 3 minutes. Confidence intervals (CI90%) for the peak plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-t) were calculated with log-transformed data. In the fasting bioequivalence study, the ratios and 90% CI for the geometric mean of dutasteride were 99.26% (93.07-105.86%) for Cmax and 102.49% (96.86-108.45%) for AUC0-t and the ratios and 90% CI for the geometric mean of tamsulosin were 102.39% (98.13-106.83%) for Cmax and 108.83% (102.49-115.57%) for AUC0-t. In the fed bioequivalence study, the ratios and 90% CI for the geometric mean of dutasteride were 92.42% (86.08-99.23%) for Cmax and 102.82% (98.73-107.08%) for AUC0-t and the ratios and 90% CI for the geometric mean of tamsulosin were 96.26% (89.86-103.11%) for Cmax e 95.88% (90.31-101.8%) for ASC0-t. At fasting and fed conditions, the test and reference formulations were considered bioequivalent since the 90% CIs for the geometric mean test/reference ratios were within a predetermined range of 80% to 125% (ANVISA).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Accennato et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: