This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
MgO–C refractory materials were developed by incorporating different ratios of alumina/titania nano-additives which were synthesized chemically. Their physical and mechanical properties, oxidation resistance, slag wettability, bulk density, apparent porosity, cold crushing strength, oxidation index, and closed porosity were tested, evaluated, and compared using conventional techniques as well as X-ray micro-computed tomography (µCT). This investigation indicated a slight degradation of physical properties and mechanical strengthening which was stronger for samples with increased alumina content. Oxidation and corrosion extent were tested both with X-ray tomography and conventional methods. The first method allowed for the calculation of the oxidation index, the detection of closed porosity, and an improved analysis of the internal corrosion, avoiding the sectioning of the materials. This result confirms the supremacy of the first technique. On the contrary, although conventional methods such as the Archimedes procedure cannot detect close porosity, they provide more accurate measurements of the physical properties of refractories. This study shows that conventional methods exhibit superiority in investigations of the pore structures of refractories for pore sizes in the range 1–2 μm, while the use of the μCT system is limited for pore sizes equal to or larger than 20 μm.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gkiouzel et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: