Key result
CABG with CE is linked to similar hospital mortality and major complications as CABG alone.
Why the study?
Coronary artery bypass grafting with coronary endarterectomy has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality, necessitating evaluation of recent advances on outcomes.
Does coronary artery bypass grafting with coronary endarterectomy increase mortality and major complications compared to CABG alone in patients undergoing first-time CABG?
Cohort (n=908)
Does coronary artery bypass grafting with coronary endarterectomy increase mortality and major complications compared to CABG alone in patients undergoing first-time CABG?
Absolute Event Rate: 2% vs 1.2%
p-value: p=NS
Coronary endarterectomy during CABG does not independently increase the risk of postoperative MI or hospital mortality compared to CABG alone in carefully selected patients.
May support endarterectomy in select CABG without added short-term risk; leaves open need for randomized trials on durability.
BACKGROUND: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with coronary endarterectomy (CE) has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality. We sought to evaluate the impact of recent advances in operative and perioperative management on outcomes after CE. METHODS: One hundred fifty-one consecutive patients undergoing first-time CABG with CE between 1991 and 1997 were compared with a concurrent group of 757 patients undergoing CABG without CE (Control). RESULTS: Age, gender, left ventricular ejection fraction, percent nonelective were similar in both groups. Compared with control, the CE group had a higher incidence of hypertension (80% versus 71%, p = 0.02), diabetes (42% versus 32%, p = 0.01), prior myocardial infarction (MI) (68% versus 59%, p = 0.05), peripheral vascular disease (36% versus 16%, p < 0.001), renal failure (15% versus 4%, p < 0.001), and three-vessel coronary disease (81% versus 70%, p = 0.007), resulting in higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons database predicted mortality (4.9+/-5.9% versus 3.9+/-4.6%, p = 0.05). Despite the higher risk profile of the CE group, hospital mortality (CE 2.0%, Control 1.2%) and the incidence of major complications such as cerebrovascular accident (CVA) (0.7% versus 1.5%), major respiratory complications (8% versus 5%), and postoperative MI (3% versus 1.4%) were similar between the groups (all p = NS). In a multiple logistic regression analysis, prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass time was an independent predictor of postoperative MI (odds ratio 1.2, CI 1.05 to 1.39, p < 0.01) and the use of heparin-bonded cardiopulmonary bypass circuits of reduced MI rate (odds ratio 0.25, CI 0.08 to 0.76, p < 0.01). Mean follow-up for 94% of patients was 30+/-19 months (range 1 to 83 months). Five-year survival after CE was 70+/-5%, with 96% of patients in Canadian Cardiovascular Society class I/II. CONCLUSIONS: In a contemporary series of carefully selected patients, mortality and major complications after CE are now similar to CABG without CE. CE itself is not an independent predictor of postoperative MI. Functional class of hospital survivors is excellent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shapira et al. (1999) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery disease requiring first-time CABG (n=908). Coronary artery bypass grafting with coronary endarterectomy vs. Coronary artery bypass grafting without coronary endarterectomy was evaluated on Hospital mortality (p=NS). Coronary artery bypass grafting with coronary endarterectomy was associated with similar hospital mortality (2.0% vs 1.2%, p=NS) and major complications compared to CABG alone.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: