Key result
Prenatal lurasidone or quetiapine shows no increased risk of major malformations versus controls.
Why the study?
No systematically ascertained human reproductive safety data are available for lurasidone, and prospective data for quetiapine are limited, complicating decisions about their use during pregnancy.
Does exposure to lurasidone or quetiapine during pregnancy increase the risk of major malformations in infants of women with psychiatric illness?
Cohort (n=1,284)
Blinded outcome assessment
Yes
Does exposure to lurasidone or quetiapine during pregnancy increase the risk of major malformations in infants of women with psychiatric illness?
Lurasidone and quetiapine exposure during pregnancy do not appear to significantly increase the risk of major malformations compared to controls.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports individualized prescribing in pregnancy; leaves open larger prospective confirmation of safety.
Background: Second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs), also called atypical antipsychotics, are common therapies for women with a spectrum of psychiatric disorders. No systematically ascertained human reproductive safety data are available for lurasidone, and prospective data for quetiapine are limited, making decisions regarding use of these medications during pregnancy complicated. Materials and Methods: The National Pregnancy Registry for Psychiatric Medications is a prospective cohort study designed to collect reproductive safety data relative to SGAs. Pregnant women aged 18–45 years, with psychiatric illness and prenatal psychotropic medication exposure completed three phone interviews during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Cases of presumed malformations are abstracted from medical records for adjudication by a teratologist blinded to medication exposure. Results: Of 2,293 women enrolled at the time of analysis, 134 in the lurasidone group, 264 in the quetiapine group, and 886 controls completed the postpartum interview and were therefore eligible for inclusion. Dropped or lost-to-follow-up participants (13%) and those currently pregnant were excluded. Participants were predominantly White, college-educated, and married (lurasidone = 88.1%, 76.9%, 77.6%; quetiapine = 89.8%, 71.2%, 75.0%; controls = 92.7%, 86.7%, 89.1%). Absolute risks of major malformations were 2.19% (lurasidone), 1.85% (quetiapine), and 1.77% (controls). Odds ratios comparing lurasidone and quetiapine with controls were 1.24 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.36–4.32) and 1.04 (95% CI = 0.38–2.85), respectively. Conclusions: No specific patterns of malformations were observed in infants exposed to the medications of interest. Lurasidone and quetiapine did not appear to be major teratogens, but further information is needed to refine risk estimates. Food and Drug Administration guidance underscores the importance of pregnancy registries. Clinical trial number: NCT01246765.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cohen et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in psychiatric disorders (n=1,284). Lurasidone and Quetiapine vs. controls was evaluated on major malformations (OR 1.24, 95% CI 0.36-4.32). Prenatal exposure to lurasidone or quetiapine did not significantly increase the risk of major malformations compared to controls (lurasidone OR 1.24, 95% CI 0.36-4.32; quetiapine OR 1.04).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: