Key result
Non-intubated anesthesia emerges as a potentially safe alternative to traditional intubation for thoracic surgery.
Why the study?
Non-intubated thoracic surgery techniques have re-emerged due to advances in surgical and anesthetic methods, but experience is limited and optimal techniques and outcomes remain unclear.
Non-intubated anesthetic techniques for thoracic surgery are emerging as a potentially safe alternative to traditional intubation, though larger studies are needed to confirm long-term benefits.
Revives interest in non-intubated anesthesia for VATS; extends historical concepts but leaves open safety and efficacy in modern practice.
Non-intubated thoracic surgery is not a new concept, though its use was discontinued with the invention of the double lumen endotracheal tube, and the traditional technique of general anesthesia, muscle relaxation and one-lung positive pressure ventilation became standard. Recent developments in surgical techniques encompassing multi and uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery in a drive to reduce the operative invasiveness, however, have now allowed us to re-examine our anesthetic technique. This along with advances in anesthetic and monitoring techniques make non-intubated thoracic surgery safer to use by experienced anesthetists. The concept is to maintain spontaneous ventilation and create a surgical pneumothorax providing the operator with a reliable surgical field and reducing the risks associated with intubation and positive pressure ventilation. The technique is gaining popularity and a number of small randomized trials and meta-analyses provide data to suggest that non-intubated surgery is safe and can offer several potential advantages as an alternative to intubation and one-lung positive pressure ventilation. Anesthetic and analgesic techniques vary widely in the published data encompassing a spectrum of consciousness from awake to general anesthesia and utilizing a number of different loco-regional anesthetic techniques and adjuncts. We describe these techniques and expose the common complications and pitfalls in detail in this article. Although experience is still relatively limited, non-intubated techniques are now being used in increasingly complicated patients and surgeries and larger, well-designed studies are now required to establish the preferred techniques, selected patient benefits and the impact on long term outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Coley et al. (2017) conducted a review in Thoracic surgery. Non-intubated anesthetic techniques vs. Intubation and one-lung positive pressure ventilation was evaluated. Non-intubated anesthetic techniques for thoracic surgery are gaining popularity as a potentially safe alternative to traditional intubation, though larger studies are needed to establish long-term outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: