Model averaging is an alternative to model selection and involves assigning weights to different models. A natural question that arises is whether there is an optimal weighting scheme. Various authors have shown their existence in others methodological frameworks. This paper investigates the derivation of optimal weights for model averaging using square error loss. It is shown that though these weights may exist in theory and depend on model parameters; once estimated they are no longer optimal. It is demonstrated using an example of linear regression that model averaging estimators with these estimated weights are unlikely to outperform post-model selection and others model averaging estimators. We provide a theoretical justification for this phenomenon.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Georges Nguefack‐Tsague (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: