Key result
Imatinib-resistant MyL-R cells display a ~5-fold higher intracellular creatine pool versus sensitive cells.
Why the study?
Metabolic differences between a novel CML cell line and an imatinib-resistant sub-clone were not characterized to understand resistance mechanisms.
Absolute Event Rate: 2.93% vs 0.601%
p-value: p=<0.05
Metabolic profiles of imatinib-resistant CML cells may reveal resistance mechanisms; leaves open clinical translation pending validation in patient samples.
The goal of this study was to examine metabolic differences between a novel chronic myelogenous leukemic (CML) cell line, MyL, and a sub-clone, MyL-R, which displays enhanced resistance to the targeted Bcr-Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib. (1)H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy was carried out on cell extracts and conditioned media from each cell type. Both principal component analysis (PCA) and specific metabolite identification and quantification were used to examine metabolic differences between the cell types. MyL cells showed enhanced glucose removal from the media compared to MyL-R cells with significant differences in production rates of the glycolytic end-products, lactate and alanine. Interestingly, the total intracellular creatine pool (creatine + phosphocreatine) was significantly elevated in MyL-R compared to MyL cells. We further demonstrated that the MyL-R cells converted the creatine to phosphocreatine using non-invasive monitoring of perfused alginate-encapsulated MyL-R and MyL cells by in vivo (31)P NMR spectroscopy and subsequent HPLC analysis of extracts. Our data demonstrated a clear difference in the metabolite profiles of drug-resistant and sensitive cells, with the biggest difference being an elevation of creatine metabolites in the imatinib-resistant MyL-R cells.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dewar et al. (2010) studied Chronic myelogenous leukemia. Imatinib resistance (MyL-R cell line) vs. Imatinib-sensitive MyL cell line was evaluated on Total intracellular creatine pool (creatine + phosphocreatine) (p=<0.05). The imatinib-resistant MyL-R cell line displayed a significantly altered metabolic profile compared to the sensitive MyL line, most notably a nearly 5-fold elevation in the total intracellular creatine pool.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: