PURPOSE: To analyze factors that predict the occurrence of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression and, in particular, the role of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) ligand-receptor system in lymphoma patients at the beginning of their treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We investigated the predictive factors for myelosuppression after the first course of chemotherapy in a cohort of 101 consecutive, previously untreated lymphoma patients receiving regimens that include doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide. Plasma samples were tested at baseline by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for TNF and its soluble receptors. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed with a forward regression procedure that included all of the parameters that were found to be significant in the univariate analysis. The dose of chemotherapy and the prophylactic treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor were deliberately included in this model. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients experienced World Health Organization (WHO) grade 4 neutropenia, and 37 patients experienced febrile neutropenia, which was responsible for WHO grade 2 through 4 infections in 23 patients. In multiparametric regression analysis, the occurrence of grade 4 neutropenia was associated with high doses of cyclophosphamide (odds ratio ¿OR, 19.8; P =.008) and high levels of soluble p75-R-TNF (OR, 8.52; P =.001). The duration of grade 4 neutropenia for more than 5 days was associated with the lack of hematopoietic growth factor administration (OR, 6.76; P =.004) and high levels of soluble p75-R-TNF (OR, 5.84; P =.0023). The occurrence of febrile neutropenia was associated with high doses of cyclophosphamide (OR, 4.7; P =.007), altered performance status (OR, 18.8; P <.0001) and high levels of soluble p75-R-TNF (OR, 3.49; P =.029). CONCLUSION: This study indicates that in addition to the dose of chemotherapy and the administration of hematopoietic growth factors, poor performance status and high p75-R-TNF levels can predict the occurrence of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression in lymphoma patients. This model may help in selecting patients for prophylactic growth factor administration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Voog et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: