We present an approach for controlling the surface wettability with two triggers through a combination of electrodewetting (EDeW) and photoswitchable arylazopyrazole-triethylammonium bromide surfactants (AAP-TB). Experiments were performed on hydrophilic Si/SiO 2 substrates using surfactant-laden aqueous droplets with a solution pH of 2.2. Two different cationic photoswitches were studied which differed in their terminal alkyl group. Here, either hydrogenated C 0 AAP-TB or butyl-terminated C 4 AAP-TB were applied. Pendant drop tensiometry revealed pronounced, light-dependent differences in surface tension and in the surfactants’ critical micelle concentrations (CMC) through E / Z photoisomerization. The more surface-active C 4 AAP-TB, exhibited the largest changes in surface tension upon E / Z isomerization of up to ~20 mN m -1 . Applying potentials of +3 V for C 0 AAP-TB and +4 V for C 4 AAP-TB induces dewetting of surfactant-laden aqueous drops on the substrate surfaces. The change in contact angle \(Δ θ \) after application of a potential was strongly dependent on surfactant concentration, where a maximum in \(Δ θ \) of 13° and 7° for C 0 AAP-TB and for C 4 AAP-TB surfactants, respectively, was observed at about 1/10 of the respective CMCs of the surfactants’ E isomer. In addition, in situ light irradiation superimposed to the driving potential for EDeW triggers E / Z photoisomerization and modulates the contact angle reversibly by several degrees and with small hysteresis. Furthermore, at specific concentrations, the interplay of electric fields and spatially non-uniform photoisomerization caused by irradiation with intense UV light generates surface tension gradients that resulted in droplet deformation, droplet splitting, and ultimately in a directed motion of drops. Thus, combining potential-induced EDeW and surface energy changes by E / Z isomerization of AAP-TB surfactants provides reversible control over wettability and offers a versatile platform for programmable manipulation of liquid interfaces. Changes in apparent contact angle and drop splitting due to a combination of light irradiation and electric fields
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shakhayeva et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: