Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The ligands PhL and MeL are obtained by condensing 2-formylpyridine with benzil dihydrazone and diacetyl dihydrazone, respectively, in 2∶1 molar proportion. With silver(I), PhL yields a double-stranded dinuclear cationic helicate 1 in which the metal is tetrahedral but MeL gives a cationic one-dimensional polymeric complex 2 where silver(I) is distorted square planar and the ligand backbone is nearly planar. In both complexes, metal:ligand ratio is 1∶1. Ab initio calculations on the ligands at the HF/6-31+G* level reveal that while PhL strongly prefers a helical conformation, MeL has a natural inclination to remain in a planar conformation. Density functional theory calculations on model silver(I) complexes show that formation of the linear polymer in the case of MeL is also an important factor in imposing the planar geometry of Ag(I) in 2.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chowdhury et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: