Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Forecasting climate-driven ecosystem impacts in the Arctic is currently limited by the availability of biological data on key species.In this study, we carried out a series of temperature-dependent growth experiments on juvenile Arctic cod (Boreogadus saida), an important forage fish species at the Atlantic-and Pacific-Arctic interface.Multi-week growth experiments were conducted across a range of temperatures (À1 to 16 C), ages (age-0 and age-1) and sizes (45-125 mm SL) to determine best-fit temperature-dependent growth models.Temperaturedependent growth models considered were 1) a single model using pooled fish of mixed ages and sizes (Model A), separate models for age 0 and age 1 fish (Model B 0 and B 1 ), and a Lorentzian three-dimensional model incorporating size but not age (Model C).All juvenile Arctic cod demonstrated relatively high growth at cold temperatures (<2 C; $0.75-1.00%d À1 ) with a deceleration in growth rate above 6.4 C and 9.0 C for age-1 and age-0 cod respectively.As such, Model A did not explain as much temperature-dependent growth (R 2 ¼ 51%) as Model B 0 (R 2 ¼ 98%) and Model B 1 (R 2 ¼ 93%).Model C did reasonably well in explaining growth over a continuous range of sizes (R 2 ¼71%) but explained less variance than either of the age models (Model B).These results stress the importance of considering the early ontogenetic effects on temperature-dependent growth variation in juvenile Arctic cod when projecting climate-driven changes in Arctic marine ecosystems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Laurel et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: