Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The present investigation aims to evaluate the strain rate dependent nano-mechanical and elasto–plastic deformation behaviour of graphene reinforced similar and dissimilar AZ31B–AZ91D friction stir welded (FSW) joints using nanoindentation and Dao-based inverse analysis. Similar AZ31B+AZ31B, AZ91D+AZ91D and dissimilar AZ31B+AZ91D joints reinforced with 0.3 wt.% graphene were fabricated at a tool rotational speed of 900 rpm and traverse speed of 40 mm/min. Nanoindentation tests were conducted up to a maximum penetration depth of 2000 nm at strain rates ranging from 0.05 to 0.20 s -1 . All joints exhibited increased deformation resistance with increasing strain rate. The AZ91D+AZ91D+0.3 wt.% graphene joint showed the highest indentation resistance, approximately 18–32% higher than the AZ31B+AZ31B joint, while the AZ31B+AZ91D joint exhibited nearly 10–22% improvement. Nanoindentation hardness increased from 1.72 to 2.24 GPa for AZ31B+AZ31B, 2.42 to 3.24 GPa for AZ91D+AZ91D, and 2.08 to 2.82 GPa for AZ31B+AZ91D with increasing strain rate. The corresponding strain rate sensitivity values were 0.08497, 0.08982 and 0.09549, respectively. Nix–Gao analysis confirmed a pronounced indentation size effect, with the AZ91D-based joint exhibiting nearly 35–45% higher H 2 values than the AZ31B-based joint. Dao-based inverse analysis revealed that the yield stress increased from 146–181 MPa for AZ31B+AZ31B and 227–278 MPa for AZ91D+AZ91D with increasing strain rate. The enhanced mechanical response is attributed to graphene reinforcement, grain refinement through dynamic recrystallization, and the presence of β-Mg17Al12 intermetallic phases within the stir zone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saxena et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: