Key result
Dabigatran linked to extensive exfoliative esophagitis and squamous cell carcinoma after 6 months.
Why the study?
Dabigatran can cause potentially severe esophagitis, but the relationship between dabigatran-induced esophageal injury and malignancy remains unclear.
Case Report (n=1)
This case highlights severe dabigatran-induced exfoliative esophagitis and emphasizes the importance of re-endoscopy after drug withdrawal to ensure underlying lesions, such as malignancy, are not missed.
Dabigatran may cause severe exfoliative esophagitis in the elderly; this case leaves open whether re-endoscopy is needed to exclude underlying malignancy.
A 90-year-old woman presented to the emergency ward with chest pain and odynophagia. Her medical history included chronic atrial fibrillation, for which she had been started a treatment with the novel oral anticoagulant dabigatran 6 months previously. The patient had not complied with the strict instructions relevant to the intake of dabigatran, namely that it needs to be taken while in an upright position with food or with an 8-ounce glass of water. After exclusion of myocardial infarction, an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD, GIF H180, Olympus, Hamburg, Germany) was performed, and revealed extensive exfoliative esophagitis with spontaneously sloughed esophageal casts, findings that were most prominent in the distal part of the esophagus ([ Fig. 1 ]). In addition, we observed an irregular nodular segment in the mid-esophagus. The patient was treated with proton pump inhibitors and was kept nil by mouth; dabigatran was discontinued. Fig. 1 Views during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) showing: a widespread spontaneous sloughing of the esophageal mucosa, compatible with extensive exfoliative esophagitis; b changes that were most marked in the distal segment of the esophagus. A repeat EGD 3 days later showed marked improvement in the esophagitis with scarring and patchy residual erosions and erythema ([ Fig. 2 a ]). However, 29 – 31 cm from the incisors, there was a semicircumferential polypoid mass that was highly suspicious of esophageal carcinoma ([ Fig. 2 b ]), a diagnosis that was supported by the findings on narrow band imaging ([ Fig. 2 c ]). Fig. 2 Views from a repeat esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) 3 days later showing: a marked improvement in the esophagitis with scarring and patchy residual erosions and erythema; b a suspicious semicircumferential polypoid lesion at 29 – 31 cm from the incisors; c the findings on narrow band imaging, which supported the likely diagnosis of an esophageal carcinoma. Histopathology of biopsies taken from this lesion confirmed the presence of a poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma, while mucosal biopsies displayed parakeratosis and acanthosis. Serology and direct immunofluorescence to exclude medication-induced pemphigoid were negative. The patient underwent an endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), which revealed a T2N + lesion, and computed tomography (CT) excluded metastatic disease. Given her advanced age, the patient was referred for palliative radiotherapy. Dabigatran was permanently withdrawn. Dabigatran is a novel oral anticoagulant which poses new challenges in terms of the management of any complicating gastrointestinal hemorrhage and because of its propensity to cause potentially severe esophagitis [ 1 ] [ 2 ]. Although the important question as to mere coincidence or causal relationship must remain open, this is the first reported case of malignancy in the setting of severe dabigatran-related esophageal injury, illustrating that re-endoscopy after drug withdrawal appears to be a reasonable approach to ensure that other esophageal lesions do not go unnoticed [ 3 ].
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zimmer et al. (2014) conducted a case report in Dabigatran-induced exfoliative esophagitis and squamous cell carcinoma (n=1). Dabigatran was evaluated. A 90-year-old woman developed extensive exfoliative esophagitis and an underlying squamous cell carcinoma after 6 months of dabigatran therapy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: