Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Classical elements of σ(70) bacterial promoters include the -35 element ((-35)TTGACA(-30)), the -10 element ((-12)TATAAT(-7)), and the extended -10 element ((-15)TG(-14)). Although the -35 element, the extended -10 element, and the upstream-most base in the -10 element ((-12)T) interact with σ(70) in double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) form, the downstream bases in the -10 motif ((-11)ATAAT(-7)) are responsible for σ(70)-single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) interactions. In order to directly reflect this correspondence, an extension of the extended -10 element to a so-called -15 element ((-15)TGnT(-12)) has been recently proposed. I investigated here the sequence specificity of the proposed -15 element and its relationship to other promoter elements. I found a previously undetected significant conservation of (-13)G and a high degeneracy at (-15)T. I therefore defined the -15 element as a degenerate motif, which, together with the conserved stretch of sequence between -15 and -12, allows treating this element analogously to -35 and -10 elements. Furthermore, the strength of the -15 element inversely correlates with the strengths of the -35 element and -10 element, whereas no such complementation between other promoter elements was found. Despite the direct involvement of -15 element in σ(70)-dsDNA interactions, I found a significantly stronger tendency of this element to complement weak -10 elements that are involved in σ(70)-ssDNA interactions. This finding is in contrast to the established view, according to which the -15 element provides a sufficient number of σ(70)-dsDNA interactions, and suggests that the main parameter determining a functional promoter is the overall promoter strength.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marko Djordjević (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: