Key result
Higher ECW/TBW linked to ~121% higher odds of a Framingham risk score ≥ 14.
Why the study?
Nontraditional factors influencing cardiovascular disease risk, including body composition and sleep-breathing indicators, require further elucidation in males.
Do body composition and sleep-breathing indicators correlate with Framingham risk score in male participants?
Cross-Sectional (n=195)
Do body composition and sleep-breathing indicators correlate with Framingham risk score in male participants?
Odds Ratio: 2.208 (95% CI 1.503–3.244)
Nontraditional factors such as extracellular water to total body water ratio, hemoglobin, fasting blood glucose, and muscle-to-fat mass ratio correlate with cardiovascular disease risk as predicted by the Framingham risk score in men.
Higher ECW/TBW may flag elevated CVD risk in men; leaves open incremental value beyond Framingham score.
To examine the correlation among body composition, sleep‐breathing indicators, and Framingham risk score (FRS) to identify and amplify nontraditional factors that influence the risk of CVD in males, A total of 195 male participants underwent examinations for body composition and sleep‐breathing monitoring. We compared the differences in individual factors across various FRS groups. We further conducted multiple linear regression analysis. A cutoff value of FRS ≥ 14 was utilized, and potential influencing factors were examined by logistic regression analysis. Statistical differences were observed in the levels of fasting blood glucose (FBG), CO2, serum ferritin, hemoglobin (HB), and ECT/TBW among the FRS tripartite groups. However, no significant differences were found in AHI and MSpO2. The multiple linear regression analysis revealed positive correlations between ECW/TBW and FBG with FRS (β = 0.324 and 0.324, p < 0.001), while HB and muscle/fat mass exhibited negative correlations with the score (β = −0.185 and − 0.169, p < 0.01). These five factors—ECW/TBW, FBG, HB, serum ferritin, and muscle/fat mass—collectively accounted for 28.6% of the variation in FRS. A higher ECW/TBW was significantly associated with FRS ≥ 14 (OR = 2.208, 95% CI: 1.503–3.244). Conversely, reduced levels of muscle/fat mass, HB, and basal metabolic rate (BMR) were significantly linked to moderate‐to‐high CVD risk (ORratio = 0.532, 95% CI: 0.284–0.996; ORHB = 0.961, 95% CI: 0.932–0.991; ORBMR = 0.997, 95% CI: 0.995–1.000). This study revealed correlations among ECW/TBW, HB, FBG, and muscle‐to‐fat mass ratio with the risk of CVD predicted using FRSs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular Disease Risk (n=195). Higher extracellular water to total body water ratio (ECW/TBW) vs. Lower ECW/TBW was evaluated on Framingham risk score (FRS) ≥ 14 (OR 2.208, 95% CI 1.503-3.244). Higher extracellular water to total body water ratio (ECW/TBW) was significantly associated with a Framingham risk score ≥ 14 (OR 2.208; 95% CI 1.503-3.244).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: