Five polymorphs of the antidepressant drug venlafaxine hydrochloride (VenHCl) are reported. Forms 1 and 2 are crystalline modifications, form 3 is obtained by melting, form 4 is a hydrate/alcoholate, and form 5 is an amorphous, glassy phase from sublimation. These five polymorphs of VenHCl are characterized by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), thermogravimetry analysis (TGA), powder X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy, and additionally structures of polymorphs 1 and 2 are confirmed by single-crystal XRD ( Pca 2 1 and P 2 1 / n ). The endotherms for the melting transition of forms 1−4 appear at slightly different temperatures in different patents. Moreover, DSC thermograms of forms 1 and 2 (recorded at 10 K/min) are single, sharp peaks, and there is no discussion of phase transition other than melting. Our DSC profiles (recorded @ 2 K/min) show that both forms 1 and 2 undergo a phase transition just after the melting event in the temperature range 210−220 °C. Form 1 transforms to form 3 (phase from melting) and form 5 (phase from sublimation), whereas form 2 converts completely to form 5 in DSC heat−cool−heat cycles. These transitions are also examined under a hot stage microscope. Form 5 is not very stable and converts to form 1 (inert conditions) or hydrate form 4 (open air) in laboratory experiments. In the heating cycle of DSC (30−300 °C), both polymorphs 1 and 2 undergo sublimation to form 5, as characterized by thermogravimetry-infrared (TG-IR) spectroscopy of the evolved vapor. There is no interconversion between polymorphs 1 and 2 in the ambient-to-melting temperature range. Crystal lattice energy of polymorph 2 is lower than form 1 by 2.0 kcal/mol. However, form 1 is stable to ball mill grinding, whereas form 2 partially transforms to hydrate phase 4, suggesting that form 1 is perhaps more suitable in pharmaceutical formulations. With the identification of at least five different solid-state modifications, VenHCl belongs to the category of highly polymorphic drug substances.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roy et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: