Key result
Adding lisinopril to irbesartan-diuretic therapy is linked to a ~56% proteinuria reduction but frequent adverse events.
Why the study?
The feasibility and efficacy of individual titration to maximize renin-angiotensin system blockade for reducing residual proteinuria in nondiabetic patients were unclear.
Does adding titrated lisinopril to irbesartan and a diuretic reduce residual proteinuria in nondiabetic patients?
Does adding titrated lisinopril to irbesartan and a diuretic reduce residual proteinuria in nondiabetic patients?
Effect estimate: 55.6% reduction (95% CI 16.0-73.2)
p-value: p=<0.02
Maximal RAS blockade with high-dose ARB, diuretic, and titrated ACE inhibitor reduces residual proteinuria but is associated with a high rate of adverse events.
May reduce residual proteinuria in select cases; leaves open safety and efficacy of maximal RAS blockade pending randomized trials.
Agents that interfere with the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) reduce proteinuria and afford renal protection. The combination of different measures that serve maximization of RAS blockade is thought to improve the antiproteinuric efficacy. The feasibility and the efficacy of such a combination strategy were studied in nondiabetic patients with residual proteinuria during previous RAS blockade by individual antiproteinuric titration. Previous medication was replaced by irbesartan 300 mg combined with a diuretic. Lisinopril was added in increasing doses until a maximal dose of 40 mg/d. Titration stopped when target proteinuria (< 1 g/d) was reached or further dose titration was not tolerated because of side effects. Residual proteinuria (median, 3.2 g/d; 95% confidence interval, 1.8 to 5.2 g/d) was significantly reduced with 55.6% (95% confidence interval, 16.0 to 73.2%; P < 0.02) on the maximal additional tolerated dose of lisinopril. The maximal dose of lisinopril was 10 mg in two of eight, 20 mg in two of eight, 30 mg in one of eight, and 40 mg in three of eight patients. At this dose, target proteinuria of < 1 g/d was reached in two of eight patients. The number of patients with adverse events during dose titration was five of eight patients: two had cough; two had hyperkalemia (> 5.5 mmol/L), one of whom had > 50% increase of serum creatinine; and one had dizziness. In conclusion, individual titration for maximal RAS blockade, entailing dose titration of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on top of high-dose angiotensin II antagonists with diuretic, induces further reduction of residual proteinuria. However, this occurs at the expense of adverse events. To further improve renoprotective treatment strategies, it is important to explore other modes of antiproteinuric intervention in patients with residual proteinuria during RAS blockade.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vogt et al. (2005) studied Residual proteinuria during previous RAS blockade (n=8). Lisinopril added to irbesartan and a diuretic vs. Baseline (previous RAS blockade) was evaluated on Reduction in residual proteinuria (55.6% reduction, 95% CI 16.0-73.2, p=<0.02). Individual titration of lisinopril added to irbesartan and a diuretic reduced residual proteinuria by 55.6% (95% CI 16.0-73.2%; P<0.02) but caused adverse events in 5 of 8 patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: