Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To compare the incidence and degree of renal toxicity associated with innovator and generic cisplatin formulations, increase in the serum creatinine (CRN) levels (mg/dL) and incidence of grade 2-3 CRN elevation during the first and all cycles of chemotherapy were retrospectively evaluated in patients treated with innovator (group 1, n = 296) and generic (group 2, n = 321) cisplatin formulations. There were no differences in the sex, age, performance status or number of chemotherapy cycles between groups 1 and 2. The median increases in CRN levels during the first cycle were 0.20 mg/dL regardless of the sex or group. There was no difference in the incidence of grade 2-3 CRN elevation between groups 1 and 2 among female or male patients. The median increases in CRN levels during all cycles were 0.2 (0-1.0) and 0.3 (0-1.8) in the female patients of groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = 0.68), and 0.3 (0-2.1) and 0.5 (0-3.6) in the male patients of groups 1 and 2, respectively (P < 0.001). Grade 2-3 CRN elevation was observed in 18.1% and 24.7% of the female patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = 0.33), and 9.4% and 20.9% of the male patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P < 0.001). Renal toxicity was slightly more severe in patients treated with the generic cisplatin formulation than in those treated with the innovator formulation, especially among the male patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sekine et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: