Optimization of perceptron neural network classifiers requires an optimization algorithm that is robust. In general, the best network is selected after a number of optimization trials. An effective optimization algorithm generates good weight-vector solutions in a few optimization trial runs owing to its inherent ability to escape local minima, where a less effective algorithm requires a larger number of trial runs. Repetitive training and testing is a tedious process, so that an effective algorithm is desirable to reduce training time and increase the quality of the set of available weight-vector solutions. We present leap-frog as a robust optimization algorithm for training neural networks. In this paper the dynamic principles of leap-frog are described together with experiments to show the ability of leap-frog to generate reliable weight-vector solutions. Performance histograms are used to compare leap-frog with a variable-metric method, a conjugate-gradient method with modified restarts, and a constrained-momentum-based algorithm. Results indicate that leap-frog performs better in terms of classification error than the remaining three algorithms on two distinctly different test problems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Holm et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: