Key result
Adding selexipag to double combination therapy reduces morbidity or mortality ~37% vs placebo in PAH.
Why the study?
Randomized controlled trial data support double combination therapy in PAH, but data on triple combination therapy are limited.
Does the addition of selexipag reduce morbidity/mortality in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension already receiving double combination therapy (ERA and PDE-5i)?
RCT (n=376)
Double-blind
1:1
Yes
Does the addition of selexipag reduce morbidity/mortality in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension already receiving double combination therapy (ERA and PDE-5i)?
Adding selexipag to background double combination therapy with an ERA and PDE-5i provides incremental morbidity and mortality benefits in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports adding selexipag to double oral therapy in PAH; extends RCT evidence for sequential triple combination.
BACKGROUND: In pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), combination therapy is an important treatment strategy. Although randomized controlled trial data are available to support the combination of two therapies, data regarding triple combination therapy are few. OBJECTIVE: The phase III GRIPHON trial enrolled 1156 patients with PAH, including 376 receiving background double combination therapy. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of selexipag as a third agent in these patients and further analyzed this subgroup according to symptom burden at baseline as indicated by World Health Organization (WHO) functional class (FC). METHODS: In this post hoc analysis, hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using Cox proportional-hazard models to determine response to selexipag versus placebo on the composite primary endpoint of morbidity/mortality. Baseline characteristics and adverse events were summarized descriptively. RESULTS: Of 376 patients receiving background endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor (PDE-5i) therapy, 115 had WHO FC II symptoms and 255 had WHO FC III symptoms at baseline. The impact on the primary endpoint of adding selexipag versus placebo to double combination therapy was consistent with the effect in the overall population (HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.44-0.90) as well as in patients with WHO FC II and III symptoms. Compared with the overall population, discontinuations due to an adverse event were higher when selexipag was added to background double combination therapy; no safety concerns were identified. CONCLUSION: The addition of selexipag to background double combination therapy with an ERA and PDE-5i provides an incremental benefit similar to that seen in the overall population, including in patients with WHO FC II or III symptoms at baseline. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01106014.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Coghlan et al. (2018) conducted an RCT in Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) (n=376). Selexipag vs. Placebo was evaluated on Composite of morbidity or mortality (time to first event) (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.44-0.90). The addition of selexipag to background double combination therapy reduced the risk of morbidity or mortality by 37% (HR 0.63) compared with placebo in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: