Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We present the ab initio results for the energetics of several SiC surfaces having different underlying bulk polytypes, to investigate the role of surface effects in the mechanisms of stacking inversion in SiC. We considered the Si adatom √3×√3 reconstruction for the cubic SiC(111) and the hexagonal SiC(0001) surfaces, taking into account the different subsurface bulk terminations compatible with the $4H$ and $6H$ polytypes, and allowing for two opposite stacking orientations of the topmost surface layer. Our investigation reveals that the energy differences among SiC polytypes are enhanced at the surface with respect to the bulk, and two-dimensional effects favor the formation of cubic SiC. We discuss the relevant role played by the surface energetics in the homoepitaxial growth of SiC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Righi et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: