Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
October 31, 2022Neurogastroenterology & MotilityOpen Access

From Chicago classification v3.0 to v4.0: Diagnostic changes and clinical implications

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

MSMorgane SalletteHospices Civils de LyonJLJamila LenzHospices Civils de LyonFMFrançois MionUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Sallette et al. (2022) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aae348ca36f6f97f31646d8https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14467
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Development of the GerdQ, a tool for the diagnosis and management of gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease in primary care2009 · 727 citations
  2. 2High‐resolution manometry in clinical practice: utilizing pressure topography to classify oesophageal motility abnormalities2009 · 328 citations
  3. 3Evaluating the reliability and construct validity of the Eckardt symptom score as a measure of achalasia severity2018 · 133 citations
  4. 4Esophageal shortening after rapid drink test during esophageal high‐resolution manometry: A relevant finding?2018 · 16 citations
  5. 5Validation and psychometric evaluation of the Spanish version of Brief Esophageal Dysphagia Questionnaire (BEDQ): Results of a multicentric study2020 · 8 citations