Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) have emerged as a promising tool for gene therapy due to their excellent safety profile and efficient transduction in multiple target tissues. Currently generated AAV yields at lab scale are in the range of 10 12 –10 14 vgc/L or between 10 4 and 10 5 vg/cell. Maximizing yields would significantly impact the overall production cost and accessibility. However, existing challenges to improving the overall yield from upstream and downstream processes persist. Using an adherent cell manufacturing process, we compared two different purification approaches to optimize the recovery from cell lysate (CsCl ultracentrifugation) and media supernatant (affinity column chromatography). We achieved combined purified yields of 2.25 × 10 13 for AAV6 (1.00 × 10 13 (44.44%) from ultracentrifugation and 1.25 × 10 13 (55.56%) from affinity chromatography), 1.11 × 10 14 for AAV8 (2.37 × 10 13 (21.39%) from ultracentrifugation and 8.70 × 10 13 (78.61%) from affinity chromatography), and 7.32 × 10 13 for AAV9 (1.10 × 10 13 (15.03%) from ultracentrifugation and 6.22 × 10 13 (84.97%) from affinity chromatography), with AAV9 showing a ∼1.5-fold increase compared to previous reports. Interestingly, we found each serotype to elute at different pH values which may influence yields. The chromatography approach obtained higher percentage recoveries for AAV6 (88.35 ± 12.87%), AAV8 (96.67 ± 0.60%), and AAV9 (93.54 ± 1.08%) from the media supernatant and also demonstrated significantly higher transduction rates. Thus, we demonstrate the potential for further expanding the AAV production capacity while also improving the final product quality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khaparde et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: