Key result
History of CAD linked to ~53% higher risk of myocardial injury after thoracic surgery.
Why the study?
The association between coronary artery disease and postoperative ischaemic outcomes after non-cardiac thoracic surgery and the differential effects of colchicine by CAD status were unclear.
Does perioperative colchicine reduce myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MINS) in thoracic surgery patients, and does the effect differ by coronary artery disease status?
Cohort (n=3,209)
Double-blind
1:1
Yes
Does perioperative colchicine reduce myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MINS) in thoracic surgery patients, and does the effect differ by coronary artery disease status?
Patients with coronary artery disease are at an increased risk of myocardial injury after thoracic surgery, but perioperative administration of low-dose colchicine did not significantly reduce this risk regardless of baseline CAD status.
CAD elevates MINS risk after thoracic surgery without colchicine interaction; leaves open targeted prevention in future trials.
OBJECTIVES: This exploratory post hoc secondary analysis of the Colchicine for the Prevention of Perioperative Atrial Fibrillation (COP-AF) randomised controlled trial evaluated the association between coronary artery disease (CAD) and postoperative ischaemic outcomes after non-cardiac thoracic surgery and assessed whether colchicine had differential effects by CAD status. METHODS: Patients were randomised to colchicine 0.5 mg or placebo two times per day for 10 days. Follow-up was 14 days. The primary outcome was myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MINS). A key secondary outcome was the composite of death, MINS and stroke. Cox proportional hazards models assessed the association between CAD and outcomes, with interaction terms to explore whether colchicine had differential effects by CAD status. RESULTS: Of 3209 patients enrolled, 331 (10.3%) had CAD. MINS occurred in 29.3% (n=97) and 18.2% (n=523) of patients with and without CAD, adjusted HR (aHR) 1.53 (95% CI 1.22 to 1.92; p<0.001). For colchicine versus placebo, the HR for MINS was 0.82 (95% CI 0.55 to 1.22) in CAD versus 0.91 (95% CI 0.77 to 1.08) in non-CAD patients (p for interaction=0.61). Death, stroke or MINS occurred in 30.2% (n=100) vs 18.6% (n=535), respectively (aHR 1.53, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.91; p<0.001). Colchicine HRs were 0.77 (95% CI 0.52 to 1.14) vs 0.91 (95% CI 0.76 to 1.07; p for interaction=0.45). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CAD undergoing thoracic surgery had a higher risk of MINS and other ischaemic outcomes than non-CAD patients. There was no evidence that the effect of colchicine differed between patients with and without CAD; however, these analyses were limited by sample size and do not exclude modest differences between subgroups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Razeghi et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Non-cardiac thoracic surgery (n=3,209). Coronary artery disease (CAD) vs. No coronary artery disease was evaluated on Myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MINS) (adjusted HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.92, p=<0.001). History of coronary artery disease increased myocardial injury risk after thoracic surgery (29.3% vs 18.2%, aHR 1.53), with no differential benefit observed for perioperative colchicine.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: