Key result
DPP-4 inhibitors were not associated with an increased risk of bleeding adverse event reports (e.g., sitagliptin ROR 0.71; 95% CI 0.67-0.76) in the FAERS database.
Why the study?
DPP-4 inhibitors improve glycemic control and may reduce platelet activation, but the associated bleeding risk compared to standard treatments was unclear.
Do DPP-4 inhibitors increase the risk of bleeding complications compared to standard treatments in adverse event reports?
Observational
Do DPP-4 inhibitors increase the risk of bleeding complications compared to standard treatments in adverse event reports?
Odds Ratio: 0.71 (95% CI 0.67–0.76)
Analysis of the FAERS database suggests that DPP-4 inhibitors are not associated with an increased risk of bleeding complications.
BACKGROUND: Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors improve glycemic control, and sitagliptin has been associated with a reduction in cardiovascular events. In vivo data suggest reduced platelet activation, and aggregation may play a role, and therefore, increased bleeding risk is possible. OBJECTIVE: Comparatively assess bleeding risks associated with DPP-4 inhibitors against standard treatment. METHODS: Exploratory analyses of adverse event reports (AERs) from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database (2004-2012 periods) were conducted. DPP-4 inhibitor-related bleeding was assessed with metformin as negative control, and aspirin, clopidogrel, and prasugrel illustrated positive comparators. Reporting odds ratios (RORs) and 95% CIs were calculated as a measure of disproportionality of reporting, and RORs were compared across drugs with the Breslow-Day statistics. RESULTS: From 2004 to 2012, 36 298, 4288, and 1202 AERs were found for sitagliptin, saxagliptin, and linagliptin, respectively, with 863, 102, and 14 bleeding complications. The relative reporting rate was not elevated with any DPP-4 inhibitor (sitagliptin: ROR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.67-0.76; saxagliptin: ROR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.59-0.87; linagliptin: ROR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.20-0.59) or with metformin (ROR = 0.77; 95% CI = 0.75-0.78). Sitagliptin showed relatively higher reporting as compared with linagliptin ( P = 0.006) but not with saxagliptin ( P = 0.98). As positive references, antiplatelet drugs demonstrated relatively higher reporting compared with metformin (aspirin: ROR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.48-1.51; clopidogrel: ROR = 2.28, 95% CI = 2.23-2.33; prasugrel: ROR = 5.09, 95% CI = 4.57-5.67). CONCLUSION: DPP-4 inhibitors were not associated with an undue increase in bleeding AERs in the FAERS database.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rahman et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Diabetes. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors vs. Metformin was evaluated on Bleeding complications (ROR 0.71, 95% CI 0.67-0.76). DPP-4 inhibitors were not associated with an increased risk of bleeding adverse event reports (e.g., sitagliptin ROR 0.71; 95% CI 0.67-0.76) in the FAERS database.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: