Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Tuning parameters in supervised learning problems are often estimated by cross-validation. The minimum value of the cross-validation error can be biased downward as an estimate of the test error at that same value of the tuning parameter. We propose a simple method for the estimation of this bias that uses information from the cross-validation process. As a result, it requires essentially no additional computation. We apply our bias estimate to a number of popular classifiers in various settings, and examine its performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2009 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: