This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Objectives To develop and validate a framework combining deep learning–based detection with geometric severity assessment of open gingival embrasures (OGEs) from intraoral photographs. Methods A total of 3,995 OGEs from 653 intraoral photographs collected across three orthodontic centres were annotated at the pixel level for maxillary tooth crowns and anterior OGEs. Model development used five-fold cross-validation on images from Centres 1 and 2, with patient-level separation to prevent data leakage. Five cross-validation models per architecture were evaluated on an independent test set from Centre 3. Performance was evaluated at the pixel (DSC, IoU), instance (precision, recall, F1-score), and grading level (accuracy, AUC). Results Mask R-CNN achieved superior OGE segmentation performance (DSC 0.812 ± 0.111 vs. 0.597 ± 0.135 for YOLOv8), with improved boundary accuracy, while both models demonstrated high tooth crown segmentation accuracy (DSC > 0.95). Among successfully detected and matched OGEs, the grading framework demonstrated strong discriminative performance, with area under the curve values of 0.939 ± 0.009 for YOLOv8 and 0.933 ± 0.008 for Mask R-CNN, and comparable classification accuracy between models (0.86 ± 0.01 for YOLOv8 and 0.86 ± 0.03 for Mask R-CNN). As no Grade III OGEs were present in the external test set, grading performance was evaluated only between Grades I and II. Conclusions This study presents a framework combining deep learning–based OGE detection with interpretable geometric severity grading. Grading performance was evaluated only between Grades I and II in the external test set; Grade III requires further validation. Clinical significance The proposed approach provides objective OGE assessment from clinical intraoral photographs and may support future remote orthodontic monitoring after further validation with patient-acquired images.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: