Why the study?
Increasing evidence has been accumulating globally on the effectiveness and safety of rotavirus vaccines in preventing acute gastroenteritis in infants.
Do rotavirus vaccines prevent acute gastroenteritis in infants?
Do rotavirus vaccines prevent acute gastroenteritis in infants?
Effect estimate: 85% vaccine effectiveness
Rotavirus vaccines are highly effective in preventing severe acute gastroenteritis in infants, though contraindicated in those with significant immune deficiency.
Supports rotavirus vaccination programs in infants; leaves open need for ongoing intussusception surveillance in diverse populations.
The present statement provides information concerning the clinical rotavirus disease and rotavirus vaccines in Canada. Since the implementation of publically funded rotavirus vaccine programs in Canada, increasing evidence has been accumulating globally as to the effectiveness of rotavirus vaccines in the prevention of acute gastroenteritis. Current data estimate vaccine effectiveness to be in the order of 85% for preventing severe disease, including hospitalizations and emergency department visits, when vaccine coverage is high. Also, substantial herd protection in older children has been documented. Post-marketing surveillance has detected a very small increased risk of intussusception (one to three per 100,000) in children, usually occurring within 1 week of vaccination. Infants who have an identified significant immune deficiency or are suspected of having such a condition should not receive rotavirus vaccine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nicole Le Saux (2017) conducted a review in Rotavirus disease and acute gastroenteritis. Rotavirus vaccines was evaluated on Prevention of severe disease, including hospitalizations and emergency department visits (85% vaccine effectiveness). Rotavirus vaccines demonstrate approximately 85% effectiveness in preventing severe acute gastroenteritis, with a very small increased risk of intussusception (1 to 3 per 100,000).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: