In experiments published in his book of 1882, Sir John Lubbock demonstrated that removal of the ultraviolet (u.v.) wavelengths decreased the effectiveness of natural sunlight in stimulating ants to carry their pupae into the dark. An apparently high sensitivity to near-ultraviolet light was subsequently shown in studies of phototaxis in bees (Bertholf, 1931a, b; Heintz, 1959) and flies (Bertholf, 1932; Cameron, 1938). More recently electrophysiological techniques have been employed to study selective adaptation of the retinal action potential (Walther & Dodt, 1959; Goldsmith, 1960) and the spectral responses of single retinular cells (Autrum & Burkhardt, 1960; Autrum & von Zwehl, 1962, 1964; Burkhardt, 1962; Autrum, 1965). This work demonstrates that honeybees (Apis) have u.v. receptors with peak sensitivity at 340 nm. and the cockroach (Periplaneta) at ∼ 350 nm. The photoreceptors of flies (Calliphora) show two maxima, one of which lies at about 350 nm. The peaks are less well defined, but u.v. receptors maximal at about 350 nm. also seem to be present in Coleoptera, Lepidoptera (Hasselmann, 1962) and probably Odonata (Ruck, 1965). These peaks are not due to secondary excitation of the visual pigments through fluorescence of accessory pigment for (1) both bees and flies are phototactically several times more sensitive to the 365 nm. mercury line than to any longer wavelengths (Bertholf, 1931a, b, 1932; Cameron, 1938); (2) in flies the u.v. maxima seen in the retinal action potential are higher than the peaks in the visible region of the spectrum (Walther & Dodt, 1959; Burkhardt, 1962); and (3) bees can be trained to discriminate u.v. from all other wavelengths or mixtures of wavelengths (e.g. Daumer, 1956).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goldsmith et al. (1968) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: