This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
AIM: To examine the reproducibility of crown-heel length measurement; the precision and reproducibility of knee-heel length measurement; and the association between the two in healthy preterm infants. METHODS: Paired crown-heel and knee-heel lengths were measured on 172 occasions by three observers in 43 preterm infants between 205 and 458 days of postconceptional age. RESULTS: Crown-heel length (CHL) measurement was highly reproducible, with a coefficient of variation (CV) of 0.41%. Knee-heel length (KHL) measurement was relatively precise (CV 0.78%), but less reproducible (intra-observer CV 1.77%, intra-observer CV 2.11%), especially in larger infants. The association between KHL and CHL was not consistent and varied with age. KHL was a poor predictor of CHL, with a 95% predictive interval of +/- 27.5 mm. CONCLUSIONS: KHL was less reproducible than CHL, especially in larger infants, and a poor predictor of CHL.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Griffin et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: