Key result
Cisplatin-gemcitabine plus SU5416 linked to ~42% rate of thromboembolic events and coagulation activation.
Why the study?
An increased incidence of thromboembolic events was observed during treatment with cisplatin-gemcitabine plus SU5416, prompting analysis of coagulation and endothelial activation parameters.
Does the combination of cisplatin, gemcitabine, and SU5416 increase endothelial cell activation and coagulation cascade activation compared to either therapy alone?
Observational (n=26)
Does the combination of cisplatin, gemcitabine, and SU5416 increase endothelial cell activation and coagulation cascade activation compared to either therapy alone?
The combination of cisplatin, gemcitabine, and SU5416 leads to synergistic endothelial damage and coagulation activation, potentially explaining the high rate of thromboembolic events and suggesting a protective role for platelets and VEGF in vascular integrity.
May increase thromboembolic risk with cisplatin-gemcitabine plus SU5416; leaves open whether VEGF inhibition drives coagulopathy.
PURPOSE: An increased incidence of thromboembolic events was observed during treatment with cisplatin-gemcitabine plus SU5416 (CG+SU5416), a tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor-1 and -2. Nine thromboembolic events occurred in eight of 19 patients. We performed an analysis of parameters of the coagulation cascade and vessel wall activation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Markers for thrombin generation and endothelial cell activation were measured in three patients treated with CG+SU5416, two of whom developed a thromboembolic event. The results were compared with measurements in six patients treated with CG alone, and in 17 patients treated with SU5416 alone. RESULTS: During cycles 1 and 2 of treatment with CG+SU5416, a significant cycle-dependent activation of both the coagulation cascade and endothelial cells occurred, whereas platelet counts decreased. Change in platelet number had a significant negative predictive effect on soluble (s)-E-selectin levels. Significant activation of the coagulation cascade only was observed in the patients treated with CG alone, whereas in patients treated with SU5416 alone, significant endothelial cell activation was observed. CONCLUSION: We hypothesize that endothelial cells deprived of VEGF after exposure to SU5416 became activated and more susceptible to damage during treatment with CG+SU5416, which was aggravated by a transient decrease in platelets, which are, among other things, carriers of VEGF. These results suggests that VEGF, in addition to being a permeability, proliferation, and migration factor, also is a maintenance and protection factor for endothelial cells, and that platelets may have a role in maintaining vascular integrity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kuenen et al. (2003) reported an observational. Cisplatin-gemcitabine plus SU5416 vs. Cisplatin-gemcitabine alone or SU5416 alone was evaluated on Activation of coagulation cascade and endothelial cells. Treatment with cisplatin-gemcitabine plus SU5416 was associated with thromboembolic events in 8 of 19 patients and significant activation of the coagulation cascade and endothelial cells.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: