Key result
Outpatient site of VTE service was associated with increased IVCF placement (HR 2.11, P<0.0001) and decreased retrieval (HR 0.77, P=0.0173) among Medicare beneficiaries.
Why the study?
Studies examining population-based disparities in inferior vena cava filter placement and retrieval among patients with venous thromboembolism are limited.
Cohort (n=516,978)
Yes
Hazard Ratio: 2.11
p-value: p=<.0001
In a large, nationally representative Medicare cohort with acute VTE, significant disparities exist in IVCF placement and retrieval based on demographics, comorbidity burden, and site of service.
Site-of-service IVCF disparities warrant monitoring in outpatient VTE care; leaves open whether standardized protocols improve retrieval in Medicare patients.
PURPOSE: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) imposes a significant clinical and financial burden on patients and society. Inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs) are considered for patients with absolute contraindications or failures of anticoagulation. However, studies examining the population-based disparities of IVCF placement and retrieval are limited. The association between patient and clinical characteristics in the likelihood of and time to IVCF placement and retrievals in a nationally representative cohort was examined. METHODS: Medicare patients aged ≥65 years with index VTE claims between 2015 and 2018 were followed through 2019 to identify IVCF placements and retrievals. Rates were compared using survival analysis methods. RESULTS: Of the 516,978 patients with VTE diagnoses, 5,864 (1.1%) had IVCFs placed, and 1,884 (32.1%) of those underwent retrieval procedures. Placement and retrieval rates varied significantly by demographics, comorbidity burden, and geographic region. From Cox regression, older age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.26; P < .0001), higher baseline comorbidity (Elixhauser) score (HR, 1.07; P < .0001), and outpatient (vs inpatient) site of VTE service (HR, 2.11; P < .0001) were associated with increased frequency of IVCF placement. The rate of retrieval was significantly lower for men (HR, 0.83; P = .0393), patients with higher comorbidity scores (HR, 0.95; P = .0037), and those with outpatient (vs inpatient) VTE sites of service (HR, 0.77; P = .0173). Neither facility- nor county-level characteristics were significantly associated with placements or retrievals. CONCLUSIONS: This large cohort of Medicare beneficiaries with newly diagnosed VTE demonstrated inequities in IVCF placement and retrieval.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Williams et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Acute Venous Thromboembolism (n=516,978). Outpatient site of VTE service vs. Inpatient site of VTE service was evaluated on Inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) placement (HR 2.11, p=<.0001). Outpatient site of VTE service was associated with increased IVCF placement (HR 2.11, P<0.0001) and decreased retrieval (HR 0.77, P=0.0173) among Medicare beneficiaries.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: