Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A range of pragmatic assessment instruments available for use with adults with aphasia is reviewed in relation to a specified perspective of pragmatic meanings (Bates 1976). The reviewed assessment instruments are divided into five hroad categories. These categories are: (1) observational profiles, (2) communicative efficiency measures, (3) standardized testing in real and/or simulated life situations, (4) family/significant others questionnaires/analyses, and (5) composite assessments. This specified perspective provides a basis for comparing the instruments' features and can assist clinicians in selecting appropriate assessment approaches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Manochiopinig et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: