Transitional Probability (TP) computations are regarded as a powerful learning mechanism that is functional early in development and has been proposed as an initial bootstrapping device for speech segmentation. However, a recent study casts doubt on the robustness of early statistical word-learning. Johnson and Tyler (2010 Johnson, E. K. and Tyler, M. D. 2010. Testing the limits of statistical learning for word segmentation. Developmental Science, 13(2): 339–345. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar])showed that when 8-month-olds are presented with artificial languages where TPs between syllables are reliable cues to word boundaries but that contain words of varying length, infants fail to show word segmentation. Given previous evidence that familiar words facilitate segmentation (Bortfeld, Morgan, Golinkoff, & Rathbun, 2005 Bortfeld, H., Morgan, J. L., Golinkoff, R. M. and Rathbun, K. 2005. Mommy and me: Familiar names help launch babies into speech-stream segmentation. Psychological Science, 16(4): 298–304. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), we investigated the conditions under which 8-month-old French-learning infants can succeed in segmenting an artificial language. We found that infants can use TPs to segment a language of uniform length words (Experiment 1) and a language of nonuniform length words containing the familiar word “maman” (/mamã/, mommy in French; Experiment 2), but not a similar language of nonuniform length words containing the pseudo-word /mãma/ (Experiment 3). We interpret these findings as evidence that 8-month-olds can use familiar words and TPs in combination to segment fluent speech, providing initial evidence for 8-month-olds' ability to combine top-down and bottom-up speech segmentation procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mersad et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: