Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The complex [AuCl(AsPh3)] reacted with MgBr(mes)(mes = mesityl) to give the corresponding gold(I) derivative [Au(mes)(AsPh3)], which undergoes substitution reactions with neutral ligands to give the neutral complexes [Au(mes)L](L = Ph2PCH2PPh2, PPh3 or PPh2Me) or with QX to afford anionic complexes Q[Au(mes)X][X = Cl. Q = P(CH2Ph)Ph3; X = Br, Q = N(PPh3)2]. The latter reacted with X2(X = Cl or Br) to give gold(III) complexes, Q[Au(mes)X3][X = Cl, Q = P(CH2Ph)Ph3; X = Br, Q = N(PPh3)2]. The reaction of [Au(mes)(PPh3)] with [Ag(OSO2CF3)L][L = PPh3 or tetra-hydrothiophene (tht)] afforded [{(Ph3P)Au(µ-mes)AgL}n][SO3CF3]n(L = PPh3, n= 1; L = tht, n= 2). The structure of [{(Ph3P)Au(µ-mes)Ag(tht)}2][SO3CF3]2 has been determined by a single-crystal X-ray diffraction study, which shows an Au–Ag distance of 2.8245(6)Å.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Contel et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: