Key result
Larger tonometry sensor angles decrease pulse wave measurement repeatability.
Why the study?
The relationship between the tonometry sensor angle and the measured pulse signal has not been objectively studied despite its potential impact on measurement reliability.
The angle of the tonometry sensor significantly affects the measured pulse signal, highlighting the need for precise positioning in pulse measurement devices.
Sensor angle markedly affects tonometry pulse variability and waveform; leaves open need for clinical validation before device refinement.
A pulse measurement by tonometry provides useful information for diagnosis, including not only blood pressure and heart rate but also parameters for estimating a condition of the cardiovascular system. Currently, various pulse measurement devices based on the tonometry have been developed. A reliability of these devices is determined by a positioning technic between the sensor and the blood vessel and a controlling technique of the pressurization level. An angle of the sensor for the pulse measurement seems to be highly related with a measured signal, however, the objective studies for this issue have been not published. In this paper, the variation of the pulse signals by tonometry direction was experimentally assessed according to the angle of the sensor. In order for guaranteeing the repeatability of the experiment, we used a pulse generator device, which can generate human pulse signal by using silicon tube and fluid pump, and developed a structure for precise adjustment of the angle and the pressurization level of the sensor. The angle of the sensor was acquired by an inclinometer, which was attached at the opposite side of the sensor. As results, a coefficient of variation (CV) of a maximum amplitude (MA) of the pulse wave was largely increased over the angle range of -9~9∘ . Furthermore, the changes of the pulse shape showed different aspects according to the sign of the angle tilted along the blood vessel. It is expected that the results of this study can be helpful for developing more precise pulse measurement devices based on the tonometry and applying in clinic.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jung et al. (2016) studied this question. Tonometry angle variation (-9° to 9°) vs. Perpendicular pressurization (0°) was evaluated on Coefficient of variation (CV) of the maximum amplitude (MA) of the pulse wave. The coefficient of variation of the maximum amplitude of the pulse wave increased to 0.073 over the tonometry angle range of -9° to 9°, indicating decreased measurement repeatability at larger angles.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: